Systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of major adverse cardiac events among patients with chest pain and a low HEART score in the emergency department
Authors:
Faisal A. Alruways
, Abdulaziz M. Alrasheed
, Omar A. Alotaibi
, Osama A. Alkilany
, Leena M. Alharbi
, Ali T. Alshahrani
, Fahad K. Mobaireek
, Omar H. Albahli
, Saad Alharthi
, Muteb O. Alharthi
, Turki Albaqami
, Abdulmajeed Z. Alhusainy
, Turki D. Alharbi
, Abdullah S. Alotaibi
, Mohamed H. Sarhan
Abstract
Background: The HEART score is widely used for rapid risk stratification of patients presenting to emergency departments with chest pain. However, a small proportion of patients classified as low risk (score ≤3) still experience major adverse cardiac events (MACE). This review evaluated the residual MACE risk and the diagnostic performance of the HEART score ≤3 threshold.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using studies identified in PubMed and Embase from database inception to January 1, 2026. Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) presenting with chest pain and reporting outcomes for a low HEART score group (0-3). Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. Random-effects models were used to pool event rates and diagnostic accuracy measures.
Results: Five observational studies including 4,072 participants were included. The pooled MACE rate among low-risk patients was 0.56% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04%-1.52%]. The pooled sensitivity was 0.90, although individual study estimates ranged from 0.03 to 1.00. Specificity was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.31-0.46; I² = 90.6%), negative predictive value was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.27-1.00; I² = 93.9%), and positive predictive value was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.01-0.18; I² = 97.0%). A negative test reduced the modeled post-test probability of MACE to 4.9%.
Conclusion: Although a HEART score ≤3 was associated with a low pooled MACE incidence, substantial between-study variability and imprecise diagnostic performance estimates limit reliance on the threshold as a stand-alone discharge criterion. The modeled post-test probability of 4.9% reinforces the need for broader clinical assessment, including appropriate troponin testing, before routine early discharge.
Keywords: Chest pain, HEART score, major adverse cardiac events, emergency department, meta-analysis.
Pubmed Style
Faisal A. Alruways, Abdulaziz M. Alrasheed, Omar A. Alotaibi, Osama A. Alkilany, Leena M. Alharbi, Ali T. Alshahrani, Fahad K. Mobaireek, Omar H. Albahli, Saad Alharthi, Muteb O. Alharthi, Turki Albaqami, Abdulmajeed Z. Alhusainy, Turki D. Alharbi, Abdullah S. Alotaibi, Mohamed H. Sarhan. Systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of major adverse cardiac events among patients with chest pain and a low HEART score in the emergency department. AMEM. 2026; 01 (October 2026): 590-600. doi:10.24911/amem.15-3067
Publication History
Received: August 04, 2026
Revised: August 23, 2026 Revised: August 29, 2026
Accepted: September 07, 2026
Published: October 01, 2026
Authors
Abdulaziz M. Alrasheed
College of Medicine at Dawadmi, Shaqra University, Dawadmi, Saudi Arabia.
Osama A. Alkilany
Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Leena M. Alharbi
College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Omar H. Albahli
College of Medicine at Dawadmi, Shaqra University, Dawadmi, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmajeed Z. Alhusainy
College of Medicine at Shaqra, Shaqra University, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah S. Alotaibi
College of Medicine at Dawadmi, Shaqra University, Dawadmi, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed H. Sarhan
College of Medicine at Shaqra, Shaqra University, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia.