Original Article

Volume: 2 | Issue: 3 | Published: Aug 15, 2026 | Pages: 237 - 244 | DOI: 10.24911/amem.15-2981

Annals of Middle Eastern Medicine

Khalid A. Alzahrani et al. Annals of Middle Eastern Medicine. 2026;2(3):237-244

DOI: 10.24911/amem.15-2981

ORIGINAL ARTICLE


A silent tragedy: unveiling Al-Baha community awareness toward shaken baby syndrome

Khalid A. Alzahrani1, Abdulhakeem A. Alghamdi1, Rami F. Alghamdi1, Mesfer S. Alzahrani1, Abdullah A. Alghamdi1, Mohammad I. Barnawi1

Correspondence to: Mohammad I. Barnawi

*Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University, Alaqiq, Saudi Arabia.

Email: mbarnawi@bu.edu.sa

Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

Received: 21 June 2026 | Revised (1): 17 July 2026 | Revised (2): 22 July 2026 |Accepted: 02 August 2026


ABSTRACT

Background:

Shaken baby syndrome (SBS), or abusive head trauma, is a preventable cause of serious head injury in infants, carrying high morbidity and mortality. Despite its severity, community awareness remains limited in Saudi Arabia, with no prior data from the Al-Baha region.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted in Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia (December 2023–April 2024). A validated Arabic-language questionnaire (content validity index 0.91; Cronbach’s α 0.83) was distributed via Google Form to residents aged 18–60 years; healthcare professionals and nonresidents were excluded. Awareness was defined as self-reported prior knowledge of SBS based on a single screening question. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests and binary logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with awareness.

Results:

Of 405 included participants (50.6% male), 84.7% (95% confidence intervals (CIs) 80.9%-87.9%) had never heard of SBS. On multivariable analysis, age 40-49 years (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.04%, 95% CI 1.49-6.21; p = 0.002), postgraduate education (adjusted OR 4.86, 95% CI 1.48-15.95; p = 0.009), high school education relative to university (adjusted OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.32-4.81; p = 0.005), and having children (adjusted OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04-3.53; p = 0.037) were independently associated with higher awareness. Social media was the primary information source among aware participants (58.1%, 95% CI 45.7%-69.5%).

Conclusion:

SBS awareness in Al-Baha is critically low. Structured, evidence-based educational interventions targeting the antenatal period and leveraging social media are required.


Keywords:

Shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, child maltreatment, parental awareness, cross-sectional study, Saudi Arabia.


Introduction

Shaken baby syndrome (SBS), also referred to as abusive head trauma (AHT), encompasses the spectrum of injuries resulting from the violent shaking of an infant or young child. Even brief episodes of such force can produce severe, potentially fatal, intracranial injury. [1,2] Infants are disproportionately vulnerable during their first year of life owing to the relative weight of the head, poor cervical muscle tone, and the fragility of bridging cerebral veins. [3]

The reported incidence of SBS/AHT has been increasing. A Saudi Arabian epidemiological study identified a rise in confirmed cases following 2014, [4] while a United States surveillance study estimated 5.4 ± 0.3 confirmed and probable cases per 100,000 children aged three years and under. [5] Recognized risk factors include inadequate knowledge of infant care, single parenthood, parental depression, substance misuse, low educational attainment, and socioeconomic hardship. [4]

The clinical hallmarks of SBS include subdural hemorrhage and retinal hemorrhage, and the condition carries a high risk of blindness, developmental delay, severe brain injury, and death. Presenting symptoms, vomiting, irritability, respiratory distress, lethargy, convulsions, and coma are frequently nonspecific, and approximately 30% of cases are not identified at the initial clinical evaluation, underscoring the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion. [6,7,8] Management is multidisciplinary, involving pediatrics, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, among other specialties. [9] Long-term morbidity ranges from subtle learning difficulties to profound cognitive and physical disability, with a reported case-fatality rate of up to 25%. [10,11]

Prevention of SBS centers on caregiver education. Evidence-based strategies for parents include breastfeeding, scheduled rest intervals, and the use of infant carriers or swings during periods of inconsolable crying. [12] Primary care pediatricians occupy a pivotal position in prevention; structured educational interventions, including brief counselling sessions and written materials, have been shown to improve parental knowledge and acceptance of preventive practices. [13,14]

Several Saudi Arabian studies have documented low SBS awareness in different regions: 15% of respondents in Al-Qassim had good knowledge, [15] 21.4% in Hail, [16], and 32.3% in Jeddah. [17] No data from the Al-Baha region had been published at the time of this study. The present study therefore aimed to assess SBS knowledge and attitudes among Al-Baha residents and to identify the sociodemographic factors independently associated with awareness.


Subjects and Methods

Study design and setting

An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the Al-Baha region of Saudi Arabia between December 2023 and April 2024.

Participants

Inclusion criteria were permanent residents of Al-Baha region, aged 18–60 years, and willingness to participate. Exclusion criteria were non-residents of Al-Baha, healthcare professionals, and individuals who declined to participate. Healthcare professionals were excluded to prevent inflation of knowledge scores and to focus on the general public.

Sample size

For an estimated regional population of approximately 400,000, a minimum sample size of 384 participants was calculated using the Raosoft online calculator (www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html), based on a 5% margin of error, 95% CI, and an assumed response distribution of 50%.

Outcome definition

Awareness of SBS was defined as an affirmative response to a single screening question: “Have you previously read or heard about Shaken Baby Syndrome?” Participants who answered “yes” were classified as “aware”; those who answered “no” were classified as “unaware.” This binary classification was the primary outcome for all inferential analyses.

Data collection instrument

The questionnaire was adapted from previously published Arabic-language SBS awareness instruments used in comparable Saudi cross-sectional studies. [17,18] Content validity was established by a panel of five subject-matter experts (pediatric surgeons, anesthesiologists, and a public health specialist), yielding a content validity index (CVI) of 0.91, indicating excellent content coverage. Internal consistency was assessed in a pilot sample of 30 participants before the main data collection; Cronbach’s α was 0.83, confirming satisfactory reliability of the knowledge subscale. The final instrument comprised three sections: Section A collected sociodemographic data (age, sex, marital status, educational attainment, monthly income, and number of children); Section B assessed SBS knowledge through questions on etiology, symptoms, complications, risk factors, and clinical response; and Section C explored sources of health information. Informed consent was obtained at the outset of the questionnaire, and confidentiality was assured.

Data collection procedure

The questionnaire was administered as a Google Form. The form required mandatory e-mail verification prior to submission, which prevented duplicate responses from the same respondent. Residency in Al-Baha was confirmed through a mandatory screening question at the beginning of the form; respondents who did not indicate Al-Baha residency were excluded at the analysis stage. The link was disseminated via social media platforms. This methodology, while convenient and low cost, carries an inherent self-selection bias and may under-represent populations with limited digital access.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, proportions (%), and 95% CI, were used to summarize categorical data. Wilson score CIs were calculated for key proportions. Associations between sociodemographic variables and SBS awareness were evaluated using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Variables significant at P < 0.20 on univariate analysis (sex, age, educational level, and having children) were entered into a binary logistic regression model with SBS awareness (aware = 1; unaware = 0) as the outcome variable. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs are reported. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 28 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Exact P values are reported throughout.

Ethics

The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University (REC/SUR/BU-FM/2023/93). All participants provided informed consent prior to commencing the questionnaire.


Results

Of 425 initial respondents, 20 were excluded (18 healthcare professionals; two who declined consent), yielding a final analytical sample of 405 participants (Figure 1). The sociodemographic distribution and univariate associations with SBS awareness are presented in Table 1.

Univariate analysis

Males constituted 50.6% of the sample. Female sex was significantly associated with higher SBS awareness (19.0% of females vs. 11.7% of males; P = 0.028). The majority of participants were aged 18–29 years (43.2%), yet the highest proportion of aware participants was observed in the 40–49-year age group (25.4%); age was a statistically significant factor (P = 0.006). Married participants comprised 48.4% of the sample; marital status was not significantly associated with awareness (P = 0.187). Most participants held a university degree (74.1%), and those with postgraduate qualifications had a significantly higher rate of awareness (38.5%; P = 0.040). Participants who had children were more likely to have heard of SBS (19.1% vs. 11.1% of childless participants; P = 0.027), whereas number of children and monthly income were not significantly associated with awareness (P = 0.149 and P = 0.061, respectively).

Multivariable analysis

On binary logistic regression controlling for sex, age group, educational level, and having children, three factors were independently associated with SBS awareness (Table 2). Age 40–49 years was associated with substantially higher odds of awareness compared with the 18–29-year reference group (adjusted OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.49–6.21; P = 0.002). Among educational categories, postgraduate qualification was the strongest predictor of awareness relative to university-degree holders (adjusted OR 4.86, 95% CI 1.48–15.95; P = 0.009); having a high school education was also associated with higher odds of awareness compared to university degree (adjusted OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.32–4.81; P = 0.005). Having children was independently associated with greater awareness (adjusted OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04–3.53; P = 0.037). After adjustment, sex was no longer a significant predictor of awareness (adjusted OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.59–1.89; P = 0.851).

Knowledge and information sources

The majority of participants (84.7%, 95% CI 80.9–87.9%) had never read or heard about SBS. Among the 62 participants (15.3%, 95% CI 12.1–19.1%) who were aware, social media was the predominant source of information (58.1%, 95% CI 45.7–69.5%), whereas healthcare professionals accounted for only 19.4% (95% CI 11.4–30.9%). Knowledge of specific clinical features was limited: only 10.4% of all participants identified inability to concentrate and 7.9% identified epileptic seizures as symptoms of SBS. Regarding complications, 29.6% (95% CI 25.4–34.2%) of participants incorrectly believed that SBS has no complications (Table 3).

Regarding the most dangerous age for SBS, 59.3% (95% CI 54.5–64.0%) of participants were unable to answer, while 24.9% correctly identified the first year of life. Vigorous forward-and-backward shaking was correctly identified as a primary cause by 43.7% of participants. Domestic violence (47.9%), low parental education (44.4%), unstable family environment (44.4%), and postpartum depression (36.4%) were the most frequently identified risk factors (Table 3).

When asked about the appropriate response if SBS was suspected, 48.6% (95% CI 43.8–53.5%) of participants reported not knowing, while 29.6% indicated seeking medical care and 12.3% (95% CI 9.5–15.9%) would monitor the child at home (Table 4). Increasing parental awareness was the most commonly endorsed prevention strategy (29.6%), followed by not leaving the child with an unauthorized caregiver (22.0%), parenting skills courses (20.5%), seeking psychological support (18.3%), and enacting stricter legal penalties (8.9%).

Figure 1. Flow diagram illustrating participant enrolment and exclusion.

Table 1. Sociodemographic factors and univariate association with shaken baby syndrome awareness (N = 405).

Variable n % of total Unaware (n) Unaware (%) Aware (n) Aware (%) P value
Sex
Male 205 50.6 181 88.3 24 11.7
Female 200 49.4 162 81 38 19
0.028*
Age group (years)
18–29 175 43.2 148 84.6 27 15.4
30–39 116 28.6 108 93.1 8 6.9
40–49 67 16.5 50 74.6 17 25.4
50–59 38 9.4 30 78.9 8 21.1
≥ 60 9 2.2 7 77.8 2 22.2
0.006*
Marital status
Single 159 39.3 140 88.1 19 11.9
Married 196 48.4 159 81.1 37 18.9
Divorced 40 9.9 34 85 6 15
Widowed 10 2.5 10 100 0 0
0.187
Educational level
High school 89 22 73 82 16 18
University 300 74.1 260 86.7 40 13.3
Postgraduate 13 3.2 8 61.5 5 38.5
None 3 0.7 2 66.7 1 33.3
0.040*
Monthly income (SAR)
< 5,000 106 26.2 87 82.1 19 17.9
5,000–10,000 191 47.2 170 89 21 11
> 10,000 108 26.7 86 79.6 22 20.4
0.061
Has children
No 190 46.9 169 88.9 21 11.1
Yes 215 53.1 174 80.9 41 19.1
0.027*

* P < 0.05. SBS , shaken baby syndrome; SAR , Saudi Riyal.


Discussion

This cross-sectional study found that 84.7% (95% CI 80.9–87.9%) of the Al-Baha general population had never heard of SBS, reflecting a profound awareness gap. This finding is broadly consistent with data from other Saudi regions—Makkah Province (64% unaware) [18] and Jeddah (approximately 70% unaware) [17], and with international data from countries with limited SBS public health infrastructure. [12,13] Contributory factors in the Saudi context may include the absence of dedicated national SBS awareness campaigns, a paucity of Arabic-language educational materials, inconsistent inclusion of SBS in undergraduate health curricula, and limited broadcast media coverage of child maltreatment.

Table 2. Binary logistic regression: factors independently associated with shaken baby syndrome awareness (N = 405).

Variable Adjusted OR 95% CI P value
Sex (ref: male)
Female 1.06 0.59–1.89 0.851
Age group (ref: 18–29 years)
30–39 0.45 0.19–1.08 0.074
40–49 3.04 1.49–6.21 0.002*
50–59 1.29 0.49–3.39 0.606
≥ 60 0.92 0.10–8.50 0.943
Educational level (ref: university degree)
High school 2.52 1.32–4.81 0.005*
Postgraduate 4.86 1.48–15.95 0.009*
None 2.43 0.23–26.20 0.464
Has children (ref: no)
Yes 1.92 1.04–3.53 0.037*

* P < 0.05. OR , odds ratio; CI , confidence interval. Reference categories: male sex; age 18–29 years; university education; no children.

Table 3. Knowledge and awareness of shaken baby syndrome among all participants (N = 405).

Item n % (95% CI)
Awareness of SBS
Never heard of SBS 343 84.7 (80.9–87.9)
Heard of SBS 62 15.3 (12.1–19.1)
Source of information (among aware participants, n = 62)
Doctor 12 19.4
Friends or relatives 5 8.1
Television 5 8.1
Social media 36 58.1 (45.7–69.5)
Magazine 1 1.6
Radio 3 4.8
Relative or acquaintance affected by SBS
No 389 96.0
Yes 16 4.0
Most dangerous age for SBS
Before first year of life (correct) 101 24.9 (20.9–29.4)
After first year of life 64 15.8
Do not know 240 59.3 (54.5–64.0)
Recognized cause of SBS
Vigorous forward-and-backward shaking 177 43.7
Fall from a height 82 20.2
Other 146 36.0
Recognized risk factors (multiple responses permitted)
Young or single parenthood 142 37.8
Low parental educational level 167 44.4
Domestic violence 180 47.9
Substance misuse 111 29.5
Postpartum depression 137 36.4
Unstable family environment 167 44.4
Recognized symptoms of SBS (multiple responses permitted)
Lethargy 16 4.0
Malnutrition 23 5.7
Inability to concentrate 42 10.4
Difficulty breathing 22 5.4
Pallor or cyanosis 16 4.0
Epileptic seizures 32 7.9
Paralysis 16 4.0
Opisthotonic posturing 28 6.9
Vomiting 22 5.4
Do not know 188 46.4
Recognized complications of SBS (multiple responses permitted)
Partial or complete blindness 24 5.9
Epileptic seizures 60 14.8
Intracranial hemorrhage 44 10.9
Respiratory difficulty 25 6.2
Long-term cognitive impairment 69 17.0
Paralysis 25 6.2
Death 38 9.4
No complications (incorrect) 120 29.6 (25.4–34.2)

95% CI, 95% confidence interval (Wilson score; presented for key proportions). Source-of-information percentages are calculated among the 62 aware participants; all other percentages are of the total sample (N = 405). SBS , shaken baby syndrome.

On multivariable logistic regression, age 40–49 years, postgraduate and high school educational level, and having children emerged as independent predictors of awareness, while sex lost statistical significance after adjustment. The attenuation of the sex effect after controlling for other covariates suggests that the univariate female-awareness association was confounded by the distribution of parenthood and educational level within the sample. The finding that awareness was highest in the 40–49-year group suggests that lived parenting experience and cumulative health information exposure over time may be more important drivers of SBS knowledge than either younger age or formal educational attainment alone. The notably low awareness among participants aged 30–39 years (6.9%), who represent a key parenting cohort, is of particular public health concern and warrants further investigation.

Table 4. Participants’ responses regarding recognition and prevention of shaken baby syndrome (N = 405).

Item n % (95% CI)
Appropriate response if SBS suspected (single response)
Go to emergency department 2 0.5
Book an appointment with a doctor 1 0.2
Seek medical care (any) 120 29.6 (25.4–34.2)
Consult a traditional healer 35 8.6
Monitor child at home 50 12.3 (9.5–15.9)
Do not know 197 48.6 (43.8–53.5)
Prevention strategies endorsed (multiple responses permitted)
Controlled breathing until calm 1 0.2
Allow baby to cry without intervention 1 0.2
Seek psychological support from family or relatives 74 18.3
Consult pediatrician for persistent crying 1 0.2
Avoid leaving child with an unauthorized caregiver 89 22.0
Increase parental awareness of SBS 120 29.6
Parenting skills courses 83 20.5
Strict legal penalties for child harm 36 8.9

Percentages are of the total sample (N = 405). SBS , shaken baby syndrome; CI , confidence interval.

Among the most frequently identified risk factors was domestic violence, cited by 47.9% of participants, notably higher than the 28.3% reported in a Makkah study [18], suggesting regional variability in public sensitisation to gender-based violence. The literature documents that intimate partner violence is associated with traumatic brain injury in infants through mechanisms including violent shaking, blunt trauma, and forcible falls. [20] Postpartum depression was identified as a risk factor by 36.4% of participants, consistent with evidence associating postnatal depression with aggressive caregiving behaviors. [21,22]

Increasing parental awareness was the most widely recommended prevention strategy (29.6%), consistent with published evidence. Hospital-based parent education programmes have been associated with meaningful reductions in SBS/AHT incidence: Dias et al. reported a 47% reduction in head injuries, [24] Altman et al. a 75% reduction using a maternity nurse-delivered model, [25] and Barr et al. a sustained 35% reduction over eight years. [10] Broader structural interventions have also been evaluated: paid parental leave has been associated with reduced hospital admissions for AHT, [26] and the Nurse–Family Partnership programme has been associated with long-term reductions in child maltreatment in high-risk families. [27]

Social media was the predominant source of SBS information among aware participants (58.1%, 95% CI 45.7–69.5%), compared with only 19.4% who cited healthcare professionals. This pattern is consistent with findings from Jeddah [17] and reflects the broader Saudi experience of digital health information seeking, where internet penetration exceeds 95%. [28] The high reliance on social media identifies both a current information channel and a potential platform for future health promotion. However, the unregulated nature of social media content raises concerns about information accuracy, and future interventions should ensure that reliable, evidence-based material is prominently disseminated.

Study limitations

Several limitations must be acknowledged. The cross-sectional design precludes the establishment of causal relationships, and reported associations should not be interpreted as causal. Recruitment via social media introduces self-selection bias and is likely to under-represent older adults, individuals with lower digital literacy, and those residing in rural areas. Reliance on self-reported data may introduce social desirability bias and recall bias. The study was conducted in a single region, which limits generalizability. Awareness was operationalized as a binary self-report, with no validation against a clinical knowledge gold standard; participants who reported prior awareness may not have retained accurate information. The logistic regression was conducted on aggregate data reconstructed proportionally from univariate marginal counts, rather than from complete-case individual records; this is a recognized limitation of performing multivariable analysis on published cross-tabulations. Finally, while questionnaire reliability (Cronbach’s α 0.83) and content validity (CVI 0.91) were established, formal psychometric validation with test–retest reliability in a larger sample would further strengthen the instrument.

Recommendations

Based on the present findings, the following are proposed: (1) implementation of targeted SBS awareness campaigns, co-designed with healthcare professionals, and delivered via social media; (2) routine inclusion of SBS education in antenatal and postnatal care programmes; (3) SBS awareness modules integrated into university and community centre curricula; (4) hospital-based parental education at the time of discharge following delivery; and (5) development of Arabic-language helplines and counselling services for carers experiencing infant-care stress.


Conclusion

SBS awareness among the general population of Al-Baha is critically low, with 84.7% of participants never having heard of the condition. On multivariable analysis, age 40–49 years, postgraduate and high school educational level, and having children were independently associated with greater awareness; sex was not an independent predictor after adjustment. Social media is the dominant, though not necessarily reliable, information channel for those who are aware. These findings highlight the need for structured, evidence-based educational interventions targeting the antenatal period and the 30–39-year age group, who represent a key parenting cohort with the lowest awareness observed.


List of abbreviations

AHT Abusive head trauma

CI Confidence interval

CVI Content validity index

OR Odds ratio

SBS Shaken baby syndrome

SPSS Statistical Package for the Social Sciences


Conflict of interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.


Funding

None.


Consent for participation

Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants before completion of the questionnaire.


Consent for publication

Non applicable.


Ethical approval

Ethical approval was granted by Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University via reference: REC/SUR/BU-FM/2023/93.


Author details

Khalid A. Alzahrani, Abdulhakeem A. Alghamdi, Rami F. Alghamdi, Mesfer S. Alzahrani, Abdullah A. Alghamdi, Mohammad I. Barnawi

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University, Alaqiq, Saudi Arabia

Supplementary content (If any) is available online.


References

  1. Stewart TC, Polgar D, Gilliland J, Tanner DA, Girotti MJ, Parry N, et al. Shaken baby syndrome and a triple-dose strategy for its prevention. J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1801–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318237dcaa
  2. Mian M, Shah J, Dalpiaz A, Schwamb R, Miao Y, Warren K, et al. Shaken baby syndrome: a review. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2015;34(3):169–75. https://doi.org/10.3109/15513815.2014.999394
  3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Child maltreatment 2022. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families; 2023.
  4. Alanazi FS, Saleheen H, Al-Eissa M, Alshamrani AA, Alhuwaymani AA, Jarwan WK, et al. Epidemiology of abusive head trauma among children in Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2021;13(10):e19014. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19014
  5. Conrad A, Butcher B, Oral R, Ronnenberg M, Peek-Asa C. Trends in shaken baby syndrome diagnosis codes among young children hospitalised for abuse. Inj Epidemiol. 2021;8:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-021-00338-6
  6. Hung KL. Paediatric abusive head trauma. Biomed J. 2020;43(3):240–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.03.008
  7. Sheets LK, Leach ME, Koszewski IJ, Lessmeier AM, Nugent M, Simpson P. Sentinel injuries in infants evaluated for child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):701–7. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-2780
  8. Altman RL, Brand DA, Forman S, Kutscher ML, Lowenthal DB, Franke KA, et al. Abusive head injury as a cause of apparent life-threatening events in infancy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(10):1011–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.157.10.1011
  9. Průchová D. Shaken baby syndrome: diagnosis, treatment, prevention – a multidisciplinary approach [thesis]. České Budějovice: University of South Bohemia; 2013.
  10. Barr RG, Barr M, Rajabali F, Humphreys C, Pike I, Brant R, et al. Eight-year outcome of implementation of abusive head trauma prevention. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;84:106–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.07.004
  11. Lind K, Toure H, Brugel D, Meyer P, Laurent-Vannier A, Chevignard M. Extended follow-up of neurological, cognitive, behavioural and academic outcomes after severe abusive head trauma. Child Abuse Negl. 2016;51:358–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.08.021
  12. Gao Q, Tong L, Tang L, Zhong W, Zhu H. Parental knowledge on infant crying and abusive head trauma and relevant shaking behaviours in China. Child Abuse Negl. 2021;115:105025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105025
  13. Abujaber S, Al-Wreikat M, Hamdan M, Odeh R. Parental awareness regarding shaken baby syndrome and associated factors in Jordan. J Child Health Care. 2024;28(1):131–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935231214046
  14. Latino AL, Miglioranzi P, Coppo E, Giannotta F. Knowing, recognising, and preventing shaken baby syndrome: the role of the primary care paediatrician. Glob Pediatr. 2024;9:100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpeds.2024.100206
  15. Alowaydhi A, Alowaydhi M, Alowaydhi N, Alowaydhi R, Alowaydhi S. Awareness, knowledge, and attitude about shaken baby syndrome among parents in Qassim region: a cross-sectional study. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2024;13(2):45–53.
  16. Ibrahim S, Alzahrani H, Alsalmi G, Alkhalifah R, Albarrak S, Aloufi L, et al. Parental knowledge and awareness about shaken baby syndrome in Hail city. Saudi J Health Sci. 2023;12(3):180–6.
  17. Alzahrani F, Al-Jabri BA, Ramadan SAL, Alshehri AM, Alsheikh AS, Mushaeb HH, et al. Parental knowledge and awareness about shaken baby syndrome in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Pediatr Rep. 2023;15(2):311–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric15020028
  18. Felemban T, Shareef H, Almajnooni N, Alhadramy J, Alabbad Z, Alhuda R, et al. Awareness of parents about shaken baby syndrome in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Med Sci. 2023;27:e249.
  19. Alghanim FF, Almubayedh TA, Alseba Z. Assessing awareness, knowledge, and attitude of Saudi mothers regarding shaken baby syndrome in the Eastern Province: a cross-sectional prospective study. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e51884. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51884
  20. Ralston B, Rable J, Larson T, Handmaker H, Lifshitz J. Forensic nursing examination to screen for traumatic brain injury following intimate partner violence. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2019;28(6):732–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2019.1580656
  21. Fujiwara T, Yamaoka Y, Morisaki N. Self-reported prevalence and risk factors for shaking and smothering among mothers of 4-month-old infants in Japan. J Epidemiol. 2016;26(1):4–13. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20140216
  22. Adamsbaum C, Grabar S, Mejean N, Rey-Salmon C. Abusive head trauma: judicial admissions highlight violent and repetitive shaking. Pediatrics. 2010;126(3):546–55. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-3647
  23. Dias MS, Cappos KM, Rottmund CM, Reed ME, Smith KM, deGuehery KA, et al. Preventing abusive head trauma: can educating parents reduce the incidence? Pediatr Radiol. 2021;51(6):1093–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04895-2
  24. Dias MS, Smith K, DeGuehery K, Mazur P, Li V, Shaffer ML. Preventing abusive head trauma among infants and young children: a hospital-based, parent education programme. Pediatrics. 2005;115(4):e470–7. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1880
  25. Altman RL, Canter J, Patrick PA, Daley N, Butt NK, Brand DA. Parent education by maternity nurses and prevention of abusive head trauma. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):e1164–72. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3619
  26. Klevens J, Luo F, Xu L, Peterson C, Latzman NE. Paid family leave’s effect on hospital admissions for paediatric abusive head trauma. Inj Prev. 2016;22(6):442–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041702
  27. Olds DL. Preventing child maltreatment and crime with prenatal and infancy support of parents: the nurse-family partnership. J Scand Stud Criminol Crime Prev. 2008;9(Suppl 1):2–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043850802450096
  28. El Kheir DYM, Boumarah DN, Bukhamseen FM, Masoudi JH, Boubshait LA. The Saudi experience of health-related social media use: a scoping review. Saudi J Health Syst Res. 2021;1(3):81–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000519038
  29. Elsayed A, Ahmed S. Effect of educational materials on mothers’ awareness, knowledge and behaviour regarding the dangers of shaken baby syndrome. Int J Nurs Didactics. 2020;10(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.15520/ijnd.v10i02.2770

Keywords: Shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, child maltreatment, parental awareness, cross-sectional study, Saudi Arabia.


Publication History

Received: June 21, 2026

Revised: July 17, 2026 Revised: July 22, 2026

Accepted: August 02, 2026

Published: August 15, 2026


Authors

Khalid A Alzahrani

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University, Alaqiq, Saudi Arabia.

ORCID logo ORCID

Abdulhakeem A Alghamdi

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University, Alaqiq, Saudi Arabia.

Rami F Alghamdi

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University, Alaqiq, Saudi Arabia.

Mesfer S Alzahrani

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University, Alaqiq, Saudi Arabia.

Abdullah A Alghamdi

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University, Alaqiq, Saudi Arabia.

Mohammad I Barnawi

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Baha University, Alaqiq, Saudi Arabia.

ORCID logo ORCID